<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aperture &#8211; a love song</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snorrigunnarsson.com/2008/02/14/aperture-a-love-song/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snorrigunnarsson.com/2008/02/14/aperture-a-love-song/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=aperture-a-love-song</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Bushi</title>
		<link>http://www.snorrigunnarsson.com/2008/02/14/aperture-a-love-song/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>George Bushi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 20:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snorrigunnarsson.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I am not a fetish nor apple fun but totally agreed with the &quot;two-screen&quot; power of aperture. it is sort of useless to have 2 screens for editing when your software does not allow the efficient usage of them. Besides, one of my monitors is of higher quality but smaller in size. With lightroom I would need to use that small monitor for  basically all of the work becoz of better quality. While in aperture I see all the thumnbnails and related stuff and watch the full screen image on the small one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a fetish nor apple fun but totally agreed with the &#8220;two-screen&#8221; power of aperture. it is sort of useless to have 2 screens for editing when your software does not allow the efficient usage of them. Besides, one of my monitors is of higher quality but smaller in size. With lightroom I would need to use that small monitor for  basically all of the work becoz of better quality. While in aperture I see all the thumnbnails and related stuff and watch the full screen image on the small one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sigurjón</title>
		<link>http://www.snorrigunnarsson.com/2008/02/14/aperture-a-love-song/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Sigurjón</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snorrigunnarsson.wordpress.com/?p=63#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Besides, it has even been reduced in price.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Besides, it has even been reduced in price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
